Legal Opinion

Queen v. Nortel Networks

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided September 25, 2013No. CV-12-688PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2013 Ark. App. 523

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION II No. CV-12-688 OPINION DELIVERED SEPTEMBER 25, 2013 THOMAS B. QUEEN APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ARKANSAS WORKERS’ COMPENSATION V. COMMISSION [NO.F213364] NORTEL NETWORKS; TRAVELERS PROPERTY & CASUALTY CO. APPELLEES AFFIRMED ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge This workers’ compensation case concerns an injury that appellant, Thomas Queen, suffered on February 18, 2001. The Arkansas Workers’ Compensation Commission ultimately found on remand, in its April 20, 2012 opinion, that Queen’s injury was compensable, that Queen’s medical treatment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Memorandum OpinionsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Parson v. Arkansas Methodist HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Queen v. Nortel NetworksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Green v. N. Little Rock Sch. Dist.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  2. Brookshire Grocery Co. v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  3. Crow v. Advanced Dental Implants & Denture Ctr.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
  4. Queen v. Nortel NetworksCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Westmoreland v. Mena Pub. SchsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API