Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Gotham Credit Corp.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 16, 1934PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

An action in conversion for damages for unlawful repossession of the automobile of plaintiff’s assignor is not one to recover possession of a specific chattel or chattels as provided in *599rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice, subdivision 5, so as to warrant the granting of a motion for summary judgment brought under this and rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Judgment and order reversed, with ten dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.

All concur; present, Hammer, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Formel v. National City BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1934
  2. Messina v. TurritoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958
  3. Progressive Credit Union v. Mount Vernon Wiping Cloth Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958