Legal Opinion

Arbour Heights, Inc. v. Norman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 31, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly dismissed defendant’s complaint against Oliva who is plaintiff’s agent. Plaintiff is chargeable with the knowledge and conduct of his agent through whom he acted (Koslovki v. International Heater Co., 75 App. Div. 60, affd. 178 N. Y. 631). ¶ Proof of Oliva’s knowledge and conduct might defeat plaintiff’s claim against defendant but could not subject Oliva to third-party liability to defendant. Dole v. Dow Chem. Co. (30 N Y 2d 143) is not applicable. (Appeal from order of Onondaga Special Term dismissing third-party…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Koslovki v. International Heater Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Koslovki v. International Heater Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. v. Rosseel, N.V.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  2. Taft v. Shaffer Trucking, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API