Legal Opinion

Patton v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 9, 2006No. 1031809PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dr. Rita W. Patton and her employer, the Frank Kay Psychiatric Clinic, the defendants below, were granted permission to appeal from the trial court's order denying Dr. Patton and the Clinic's "Rule 50(b)[, Ala. R. Civ. P.,] Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or, Alternatively Styled, Motion for a Summary Judgment." See Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P. The trial court certified the following controlling question of law:

"The controlling question of law is the degree of proof necessary to establish the essential element of proximate causation in a medical malpractice/wrongful death action…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Bradford v. McGeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Baker v. ChastainSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  4. Spain v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  5. Pruitt v. ZeigerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Thompson v. PattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  2. Almonte v. KURLSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. BRELAND EX REL. BRELAND v. RichSupreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2008
  5. Fielder v. ChandlerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API