Ross v. Hacker
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
PEARSON, Judge.
The appellants successfully defended an action brought by the appellee for specific performance of a contract to sell real property. The appellee claimed the right to purchase the property through an assignment of the contract. The contract provided for costs and attorney’s fees as follows : “In connection with any litigation arising out of the contract, the prevailing .party shall be entited [sic] to recover all costs incurred, including reasonable attorney’s fees.”
The final judgment dismissing appellee’s complaint was entered March 23, 1973; it contained the following…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- FEDERATED MUT. IMPLEMENT & HDWE. INS. CO. v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- Keller v. PenovichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nudel v. Flagstar Bank, FSBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- MCG Financial Services., L.L.C. v. Technogroup, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014