Legal Opinion

Ross v. Hacker

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 16, 1973No. 73-547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEARSON, Judge.

The appellants successfully defended an action brought by the appellee for specific performance of a contract to sell real property. The appellee claimed the right to purchase the property through an assignment of the contract. The contract provided for costs and attorney’s fees as follows : “In connection with any litigation arising out of the contract, the prevailing .party shall be entited [sic] to recover all costs incurred, including reasonable attorney’s fees.”

The final judgment dismissing appellee’s complaint was entered March 23, 1973; it contained the following…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. FEDERATED MUT. IMPLEMENT & HDWE. INS. CO. v. GriffinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Keller v. PenovichDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nudel v. Flagstar Bank, FSBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  2. MCG Financial Services., L.L.C. v. Technogroup, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API