R. E. Ledford Construction Co. v. King
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.
In this workers’ compensation case, the employer/carrier appeals an order finding it responsible for surgical and medical costs in excess of the fee schedule set out in Fla.Admin.Code Rule 8C-7.01, and finding it responsible for the remaining balance of claimant’s hospital bill. We affirm as to both findings.
As to the latter award, the carrier argues that the judge could not modify his prior order apportioning out costs relating to the noncompensable surgery because the later order was not designed to correct a mistake of fact or a change in condition, the only grounds for…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Sun Bank/South Florida, NA v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Piezo Technology v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Sambo's Restaurant v. HornDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980