Legal Opinion
Kupferman v. Katz
New York Court of Appeals
Decided October 31, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division acted within its discretionary power in affirming the denial of the *934petition in this mandamus proceeding because of delay in bringing it. We reach no other question. No opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Brucia v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Greene v. Town Board of WarrensburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Barr v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1978
- Fossella v. DinkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Matter of Woodburn v. Village of OwegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.