Legal Opinion

Kupferman v. Katz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1963PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division acted within its discretionary power in affirming the denial of the *934petition in this mandamus proceeding because of delay in bringing it. We reach no other question. No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Foster and Scileppi.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brucia v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Greene v. Town Board of WarrensburgAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Barr v. City of SyracuseNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fossella v. DinkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Matter of Woodburn v. Village of OwegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API