Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rodman v. Deangeles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2017No. 522813Published

1DissentRose, J.

While I agree with the majority that there is sufficient medical proof indicating that plaintiff suffered a concussion as a result of the 2011 accident, the concussion itself is not at issue here. Rather, the issue is whether, at trial, plaintiff adduced the type of objective, qualitative proof of his resulting physical and cognitive limitations necessary to measure the seriousness of those limitations and meet the standard set forth in Toure v Avis Rent A Car Sys. (98 NY2d 345 [2002]). I cannot agree that the proof presented by plaintiff meets the Toure standard and, therefore, I…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Toure v. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Licari v. ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Perl v. MeherNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Dufel v. GreenNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Womack v. WilhelmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API