State v. Yusuk, 08ap-751 (3-24-2009)
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Jamal A. Yusuf, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas denying his second R.C. 2953.21 petition for post-conviction relief without a hearing. We affirm.
{¶ 2} In February 2006, appellant entered a guilty plea to four counts of aggravated robbery and one count of aggravated burglary. The trial court accepted appellant's guilty plea, found him guilty, and imposed a jointly-recommended sentence of nine years in prison, to be served concurrently with a sentence imposed in another case. Appellant did not appeal that judgment.
{¶ 3} On…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. FosterOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. ReynoldsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RobinsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2016