Mills v. Hurd
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtShipman, J.
This is a demurrer to a bill in equity on the ground of multifariousness in improperly joining distinct and independent matters in one bill. The facts in the case, as they appeared upon the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction, are stated in Mills v. Hurd, 29 Fed. Rep. 410.
The bill in No. 532 alleges, in substance, as follows: The plaintiff and the defendant Hurd were the originators of the unincorporated association or partnership sub modo formed for the purpose of owning and leasing railroad freight cars, known as the Bridgeport Rolling-Stock Association, were the original…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gaines Et Ux. v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Walker v. PowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Sawyer v. NobleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1867
3Cited by2 opinions
- Greer Inv. Co. v. BoothCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Brown v. PegramU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906