Legal Opinion

Furtado v. Maloney

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 18, 2005No. 04-1675PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Thomas M. Furtado seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal from the denial of his second Rule 60(b) motion to obtain relief from the dismissal of his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 because it was “mixed,” containing both exhausted and unexhausted claims. Because the district court did not address the merits of Furtado’s claims, a COA should may issue if he has shown that “(1) the soundness of the procedural ruling is debatable, and (2) the constitutional claim is also colorable. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000).” Mateo v. United…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Moreno-Morales v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Francis Salemme v. Theodore RistainoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mateo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API