Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Market Fruit Co. of Sanford

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 6, 1949PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Certiorari proceedings by the Market Fruit Company of Sanford, Inc., against Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, and E.R. Sessions to review an order of the Commissioner of Agriculture made pursuant to proceedings held under F.S.A. §§ 596.13, 596.14. From an adverse judgment, Nathan Mayo, as Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, and E.R. Sessions appeal.

Reversed in part and affirmed in part.

See also 34 So.2d 543. This controversy originated when E.R. Sessions, a fruit grower, filed with the Commissioner of Agriculture a formal complaint against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  2. Harry E. Prettyman, Inc. v. Florida Real Estate CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Mayo v. the Market Fruit Co. of Sanford, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1948

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of SaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
  2. Sullivan v. SappSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  3. Wilson v. Pest Control Commission of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Middlebrooks v. DEPT. OF STATE, DIV. OF LICENSINGDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  5. In re E.B.L.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API