Legal Opinion

Puccini v. Thomas & Howard Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 16, 1997No. A97A1471PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

In 1992, Sunstar, Inc. (“Sunstar”) applied for credit with Thomas & Howard Company (“T & H”) to purchase goods on account from T & H, and Robert Puccini personally guaranteed payment on the account (“credit and guaranty agreement”). When Sunstar defaulted on payments, T & H sued Puccini as the personal guarantor under the credit and guaranty agreement. Puccini now appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to T & H. For reasons which follow, we affirm.

Summary judgment is appropriate when the court, viewing all the evidence and drawing reasonable inferences in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Remler v. Coastal BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Johnson Drilling Co. v. Bank of South, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Southern Electronics Distributors, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Robinson v. Star Gas of Hawkinsville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Beasley v. Wachovia BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API