Puccini v. Thomas & Howard Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Judge.
In 1992, Sunstar, Inc. (“Sunstar”) applied for credit with Thomas & Howard Company (“T & H”) to purchase goods on account from T & H, and Robert Puccini personally guaranteed payment on the account (“credit and guaranty agreement”). When Sunstar defaulted on payments, T & H sued Puccini as the personal guarantor under the credit and guaranty agreement. Puccini now appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to T & H. For reasons which follow, we affirm.
Summary judgment is appropriate when the court, viewing all the evidence and drawing reasonable inferences in a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Remler v. Coastal BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Johnson Drilling Co. v. Bank of South, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southern Electronics Distributors, Inc. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Robinson v. Star Gas of Hawkinsville, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Beasley v. Wachovia BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006