Legal Opinion

Cowan v. Griffith

California Supreme Court

Decided July 22, 1895No. 18438PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. J. R. Webb, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action to foreclose certain mechanics’ and materialmen’s liens. Plaintiffs recovered judgment, and the Fresno Loan and Savings Bank, a mortgagee and defendant, has appealed. The build, ing upon which the liens were foreclosed was a dwelling-house, situated some five miles from the city of Fresno, and the only question of any importance involved in this appeal relates to the amount of land necessary for the convenient use and occupation of this dwelling. It is situated upon a tract of land described as lots 21 and 22, of the Easterby rancho, the entire tract containing forty acres,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Tunis v. Lakeport Agricultural Park Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Anselmo v. SebastianiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Ensele v. JolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Gregg v. H. & M. Drilling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. California Cor. Culvert Co. v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Pacific Coast Refrigeration, Inc. v. BadgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API