Legal Opinion

Hinkal, M. v. Pardoe, G.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 22, 2016No. 165 MDA 2014PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

STABILE, J.:

Melinda Hinkal (“Appellant”) appeals from the January 7, 2014 order entered in the Court of Common Pleas of Union County granting summary judgment in favor of Gavin Pardoe. (“Pardoe”), Gold’s Gym, Inc. (“Gold’s Gym”),. Gold’s Gym International, Inc. ,and TRT holdings, Inc. (collectively “Appellees”). Following review, we affirm.

In this appeal, Appellant challenges whether agreements she signed- for membership at Gold’s Gym released Appellees from liability for injuries she alleged she sustained while under the direction of Par-doe, a personal trainer, at Gold’s Gym. In…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Dean v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. Greenville Business Men's Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Chepkevich v. Hidden Valley Resort, L.P.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Toro, C. v. Fitness International, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. Valentino v. Philadelphia Triathlon, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Fellerman, S. v. PECO Energy Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Kibler v. Blue Knob Recreation, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  5. Milshteyn, P. v. Fitness International, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API