Legal Opinion

People v. Harding

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 19, 1998No. 98SA260PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This lawyer discipline case comes to us on a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct between the respondent, Curtis E. Harding, III, and the assistant disciplinary counsel. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the grievance committee approved the conditional admission and its recommendation that Harding be suspended for one year and one day with conditions. We accept the conditional admission and the panel’s recommendation.

I

Curtis E. Harding, III, was admitted to practice law in this state in 1983. The conditional admission states that Judith Glasier retained E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. HanksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. People v. HardingSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. KatzSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. HuntzingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  3. People v. CarterSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. People v. EgbuneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  5. People v. GilbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API