Legal Opinion
Heidbrink v. Charles H. Hardessen Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 3, 1928No. 3919PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVAN A. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Appellants brought suit to enjoin infringement of two patents, tbe Heidbrink reissue patent, No. 15,873, issued July 22, 1924, and tbe Heidbrink reissue patent, No. 15,874, issued July 22, 1924. Each covers “anesthetic apparatus.” Tbe first-named patent replaced patent No. 1,309,686, bearing date July 15, 1919, while tbe second replaced patent, No. 1,265,910, dated May 4, 1918.
Appellee is a distributor. MeKessen, tbe manufacturer of tbe infringing machine, is tbe real defendant.
A prior adjudication (Heidbrink v. McKessen [C. C. A.] 290 F. 665), is relied upon by…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Mahn v. HarwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Union Switch & Signal Co. v. Louisville Frog, Switch & Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- General Radio Co. v. Allen B. Du Mont Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Kalich v. Paterson Pacific Parchment Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
- Moist Cold Refrigerator Co. v. Lou Johnson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- American Steel Foundries v. LaughlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.