Legal Opinion

Whitehead v. Whitehead

Orphan's Court of Delaware

Decided October 1, 1935PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richards, Judge.

The important question for consideration in this case is whether Frederick H. Whitehead, one of the tenants in common, and the tenant in possession of the property since the death of Elizabeth H. Whitehead, has committed waste by cutting timber on the property for which partition is asked. What constitutes waste has been variously defined. Blackstone says, “waste is a spoil or destruction in houses, gardens, trees or other corporeal hereditaments, to the disherison of him that hath the remainder or reversion in fee-simple or fee-tail.” 2 Blackstone Comm., 281. The following…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ford v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Hogan v. McMahonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  3. Gedney v. . GedneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  4. Willmon v. KoyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Dunavant v. FieldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re the Real Estate of CochranSuperior Court of Delaware · 1949
  2. In re the Real Estate of SmithOrphan's Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Brown v. YoungSupreme Court of Delaware · 1957
  4. John C. Ponder v. David R. WilleyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
  5. VENERA CASSON, DANNIQUE ) CASSON, & CLARENCE ADAMS V. CARY NORRISCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API