Legal Opinion

Fischer v. Amity Harbor Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 19, 1932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The decedent, with others, came upon the property of the defendant and proceeded to the beach to go in bathing. Testimony on the part of plaintiff indicates that their course of action was prompted by signs on the highway giving notice of a bathing beach. It was while the decedent was in bathing that he was drowned in a channel excavated by appellant, which led from the waters of Great South bay into its lands where there was a harbor for yachts and other small boats. It appears in the record without dispute that this channel was built by permission of the Secretary of War and of the town…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Plummer v. DillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Cusick v. . AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Heskell v. Auburn Light, Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Ledyard v. Ten EyckNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  5. Murphy v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Yerden v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API