Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Citizens Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1918No. 9319PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint; from Colquitt superior court—Judge Thomas. ' October 2, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBboxles, P. J.

1. Counsel for the plaintiff hank having stated in their brief1 in this court that they admitted on the trial that the plaintiff bank was not a bona fide purchaser, without notice, before maturity, of the note sued upon, it will not be considered as an innocent purchaser of the note.

2. Before a.transaction can be held to be within an exception to a general rule or principle of law, its right to be so considered should • eleárly appear. A general rule of law is that parol evidence is inadmissible to add to, take from, or vary a written contract. Civil Code (1910), § 4268. There are various…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hansford v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McDougal v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Franklin v. Sea Island BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API