Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Proceedings

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided June 9, 1995No. 95-10390PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The district court below determined that certain “daytimers” sought by the government in an ongoing grand jury investigation were properly characterized as corporate documents and hence beyond the purview of the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The appellants, John Doe I and John Doe II, are executives in a company which is the subject of an ongoing grand jury investigation into possible price fixing within a certain industry. The appellants filed a timely appeal to this court, contending that the daytimers were personal documents and therefore privileged by the Fifth…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. United States v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bryan Kirby Barrett, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gerardo Acevedo, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  2. In Re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  3. Waste Management of Washington, Inc. v. KattlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  4. Bryan Kirby Barrett, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Gerardo Acevedo, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
  5. In re RussoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API