Legal Opinion

Gray v. Schultz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1965PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

On November 22, 1957, an account in the sum of $29,527.90 in the sole name of Mildred Gray at the Ladish Employees’ Credit Union was changed so that thereafter it contained the names of both Mildred Gray and her husband, Otto L. Gray. The signature card, which they both signed, was entitled, “Joint Account Agreement,” and it provided that the credit union was “authorized to pay any amount standing to the credit of the above account to or upon the order of either or both or the survivor of either of us.”

There is a presumption that a joint tenancy was intended by this transfer to joint names.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Marrow v. MoskowitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Bassler v. RewodlinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Pfeifer v. PfeiferWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Zander v. HollyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Schley v. Estate of SchleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wagner v. WagnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Keokuk Savings Bank & Trust Company v. DesvauxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  3. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Van Kylen (In Re Van Kylen)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1989
  4. Kohn v. KynastonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Miles v. HantenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API