Legal Opinion
Urgo v. Patel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 16, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action, inter alia, for specific per*519formance of a joint venture agreement, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated January 31, 2000, as denied that branch of their motion which was pursuant to CPLR 6514 (a) for mandatory cancellation of the notice of pendency filed by the plaintiff.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the defendants’ contention, the Supreme Court properly denied that branch of their motion which sought mandatory cancellation of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Felske v. BernsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- General Property Corp. v. DiamondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Peterson v. KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Yorktown Floorworld, Inc. v. Wagon Productions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Flotteron v. SteinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yonaty v. GlauberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- RKO Properties, Ltd. v. BoymelgreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007