Reliance Funding Corp. v. Sheret (In Re Sheret)
District Court, W.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
ELFVIN, District Judge.
The secured creditor, Reliance Funding Corporation (“Reliance”), has moved pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 to vacate the sanctions portion of an order of the Bankruptcy Court, alleging that the Court failed to apply correctly Bankruptcy Rule 9011(a), and to vacate that portion of the Order denying its motion to lift the stay imposed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a).
Bankruptcy Rule 9011 is a restatement of Fed.R.Civ.P. rule 11 — In re 1801 Restaurant, Inc., 40 B.R. 455, 457 (D.Md. 1984) — and, like rule 11, requires that every pleading, motion or other paper be signed by an…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Chaudhry v. Usoskin (In Re Usoskin)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- In re 1801 Restaurant, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Martinez, Inc. v. H. Landau & Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1985
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re KearneyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
- In Re JerrelsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1991