Legal Opinion
State v. Gore
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 7, 2022No. SC20211PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
March 1, 2022 CONNECTICUT LAW JOURNAL Page 3
342 Conn. 129
MARCH, 2022 129 State v. Gore STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. ANTRON GORE (SC 20211) McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn, Ecker and Keller, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to the applicable provision (§ 7-3 (a)) of the Connecticut Code of Evidence, testimony in the form of an opinion is generally inadmissible if it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of fact. Pursuant further to this court’s decision in State v. Finan ( 275 Conn. 60), lay opinion testimony identifying a defendant in video surveillance foot- age had been deemed inadmissible…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2024