Legal Opinion

Neill v. Baltazar

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 5, 1961No. 10839PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHER, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment based on a jury verdict, growing out of a rear end collision at the intersection of South First Street and West Mary Street, in Austin, Texas, denying appellant a recovery.

The appeal is founded on four points and are that the court in refusing a new trial because the answers of the jury to issues Nos. 10, 11 and 12 are so contrary to the great weight and preponderance of the evidence so as to be clearly wrong and unjust and because of a conversation between counsel for defendant and a juror constituted misconduct which probably resulted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Grand Fraternity v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Renshaw v. CountessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  3. Kuykendall v. DooseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  4. Zandras v. MoffettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Carrico v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. WagonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  2. Rash v. WhisennandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  3. Stephens v. McCarterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
  4. Baltazar v. NeillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  5. Burnett v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API