Legal Opinion

State v. Matera

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 14, 1981No. 80-1181PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL S. PEARSON, Judge.

The trial court, because of a “totality of circumstances,” granted Matera’s Rule 3.850 motion and vacated his thirteen-year-old robbery conviction. We have examined the record before the trial court and find no circumstances which would warrant a finding that Matera’s conviction was obtained in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or the State of Florida. We therefore reverse with directions that Matera’s conviction be reinstated.

Matera’s motion for relief was based on four grounds. He complained that (1) several phone calls he made from a public…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Robinson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API