Legal Opinion

Butler v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 1996No. 95-2066PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the denial of appellant’s rule 3.850 amended motion. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Appellant argued before the trial court and here that his trial attorney was ineffective for failing to contact alibi witnesses and call them ,to testify at trial. The witnesses testified at the rule 3.850 evidentiary hearing that they had not been contacted by anyone on appellant’s behalf prior to or during trial. The state presented testimony that the witnesses had been contacted in a timely fashion and could not be of assistance. After reviewing the record, we find…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Downs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Dennis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Hartley v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  4. Willie v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Heaton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. State v. JacobsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API