Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1993No. Nos. 16966, 17831PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Judge.

Following a jury verdict finding him guilty of attempted escape from confinement, kidnapping and armed criminal action, appellant was sentenced in accordance with the jury’s recommendations. He appeals from those convictions. Appellant thereafter filed a motion under Rule 29.15, seeking to vacate the convictions. Following an evidentiary hearing and denial of the motion, he appealed. Those appeals were consolidated. Rule 29.15(().

At the trial of the criminal charges, appellant testified and admitted the charges of attempted escape and armed criminal action, however, he denied…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Stringer v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. National Bancard Corp. v. Visa U. S. A., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. State v. DriscollSupreme Court of Missouri · 1986
  5. Malone v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seward v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API