State v. Berthiaume
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, J.
*438The defendant, Toby Arthur Berthiaume, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of burglary in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-101 (a) (2). On appeal, the defendant claims (1) there was insufficient evidence to convict him of burglary in the first degree, and (2) even if there were sufficient evidence to sustain his conviction, the trial court committed plain error by failing to exclude evidence of an eyewitness identification of the defendant. Unpersuaded by either claim, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- State v. CopasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. WeathersConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. MarsanConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Berthiaume v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019