Legal Opinion
Langford v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 5, 2006No. 5D05-96PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
929 So.2d 598 (2006)
William Blake LANGFORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D05-96.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
May 5, 2006.
James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Thomas J. Lukashow, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Roark Wall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
ORFINGER, J.
William Blake Langford appeals from the denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. He contends that the trial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Heggs v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Rouse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Cutts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Monnar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Poole v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.