Legal Opinion

Epler v. Funk

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 8, 1848PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In error from the Common Pleas of Dauphin county. The facts of the case are fully stated in the opinion of this court.

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

This is an action by an endorse^ against the maker to recover $100, payable to the order of Henry Hamer twelve months after date. It is endorsed to J. M. Funk, without recourse. The defence is, that the consideration of the note was for the right of vending Hoover’s patent corn-stalk cutting-machine, in Dauphin county; that the machine was entirely worthless, and that defendant was induced to enter into the contract by combination, contrivance, and fraud. The plaintiff, after proving the handwriting of the maker and endorser, offered the note in evidence, which was objected to, because, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rice v. StearnsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Packard v. WoodruffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Schofield v. LaffertySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API