Credit Union One of Kansas v. Stamm
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Davis, J.:
This appeal involves a consumer credit transaction governed by the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, K.S.A. 16a-l-101 et seq. (UCCC). The district court held that the attorney fees provisions in a consumer credit contract violated K.S.A. 16a-2-507 and imposed a $500 penalty against Credit Union One of Kansas under K.S.A. 16a- 5-201(1). The Court of Appeals reversed in an unpublished decision filed August 21, 1992, holding that the attorney fees provisions did not violate K.S.A. 16a-2-507. We granted the defendant consumer’s petition for review.
Cre…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- In Re Hudson Shipbuilders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Unsecured Creditors' Committee 82-00261c-11a v. Walter E. Heller & Company Southeast, Inc., in Re K.H. Stephenson Supply Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Joseph F. Sanson Investment Co. v. 268 LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. CatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re HyerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
- Santa Rosa KM Associates, Ltd., PC v. Principal Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
- Marrio Authony Faceson v. Flat Branch MortgageDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026