Legal Opinion

Credit Union One of Kansas v. Stamm

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 21, 1994No. 67,081PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

This appeal involves a consumer credit transaction governed by the Uniform Consumer Credit Code, K.S.A. 16a-l-101 et seq. (UCCC). The district court held that the attorney fees provisions in a consumer credit contract violated K.S.A. 16a-2-507 and imposed a $500 penalty against Credit Union One of Kansas under K.S.A. 16a- 5-201(1). The Court of Appeals reversed in an unpublished decision filed August 21, 1992, holding that the attorney fees provisions did not violate K.S.A. 16a-2-507. We granted the defendant consumer’s petition for review.

Cre…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Capital Cities Cable, Inc. v. CrispSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. In Re Hudson Shipbuilders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Unsecured Creditors' Committee 82-00261c-11a v. Walter E. Heller & Company Southeast, Inc., in Re K.H. Stephenson Supply Company, DebtorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  4. Joseph F. Sanson Investment Co. v. 268 LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  5. Mark Twain Kansas City Bank v. CatesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re HyerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1994
  2. Santa Rosa KM Associates, Ltd., PC v. Principal Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  3. Marrio Authony Faceson v. Flat Branch MortgageDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API