Legal Opinion
Crowell v. Baker Oil Tools, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 7, 1938No. 8850PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge.
A decree adjudicating -to be valid and subsisting, a license agreement from appellant to appellee, and a license agreement from appellee to appellant, is challenged by the latter.
Appellee filed a bill alleging ownership of patent No. ,1,685,307 issued to Baker, September 25, 1928; patent to Baker No. 1,748,007, issued February 18, 1930; and patent to Mellin, No. 1,859,593, issued May 24, 1932; and infringement thereof by appellant. Appellant answered, alleging among other things that he had a license from appellee to manufacture and sell the subject matter of each claim…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Furrer v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Easton v. BrantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- National Reserve Ins. Co. of Illinois v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- Exchange Nat. Bank of Spokane v. MeikleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Gila Water Co. v. International Finance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Storley v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939