Legal Opinion

State v. Ward

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 16, 1981No. 81-883PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

The state challenges the suppression of evidence in this prosecution for bookmaking. We hold that the affidavit for the search warrant was sufficient without those allegations based upon impermissible electronic surveillance and therefore reverse.

Appellee was arrested and charged with bookmaking after execution of a search warrant on the premises of one Elmira Parker. Her motion to suppress alleged that the search and seizure were invalid because the affidavit for the warrant was based in part on the unreasonable interception of private communications between Elmira Parker and a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SarmientoSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  2. Antone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  3. Neary v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  4. State v. GiesekeSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Law v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HunwickDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. Willis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. State v. GibsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  4. State v. ParkerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. State v. FernandezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API