Legal Opinion

Arklay S. Richards Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 13, 1965No. 69688; protest 62/11904 (Boston)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of porcelain thermocouple tubes and that the involved articles are not chemical porcelain ware but are, in fact, articles in chief value *517of earthy or mineral substances, not decorated or commercially susceptible of decoration in any manner, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. John H. Faunae, Philadelphia, Inc. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 196, C.D. 2085), followed.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Faunce v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959