Legal Opinion
Cody v. Phil's Towing Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 11, 2002No. 00-1699PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DIAMOND, District Judge.
Presently before the court are plaintiffs motion for leave to file an amended complaint adding Ohio River Company as a defendant “for purposes of the limitation fund only” in conjunction with defendant’s affirmative defense under the Limitation of Shipowners’ Liability Act of 1851, 46 App.U.S.C. §§ 181-189, and a number of other pretrial motions related to that defense. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion for leave will be granted and the related motions will be resolved in accordance with this opinion.
Plaintiff commenced this action under the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lewis v. Lewis & Clark Marine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Jeffrey B. Newman v. Ghs Osteopathic, Inc., Parkview Hospital Division. Jeffrey B. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Sturgis v. BoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- The Eugene F. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Aramark Sports & Entertainment Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Auerbach v. Tow Boat U.S.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- B & C SEAFOOD LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- Great Lakes Insurance S.E. v. Sunshine Shopping Center, Inc., d/b/a Sunshine MallDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2022
- REILLY v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2023