Legal Opinion

Waddell, Et Ux. v. Donelly

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 9, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas, J. —

To simplify this opinion plaintiffs in error will be called defendants and defendant in error, plaintiff.

Plaintiff sued defendants in ejectment claiming Lot twelve in Block four, Unit one of Hamilton Estates. The only plea filed in the case was as follows:

“And now comes the defendant, Maude Waddell, joined by her husband, Albert Waddell, and for her plea to the declaration now on file herein says: That she is not guilty.”

At the conclusion of all the testimony the court granted the motion of the plaintiff for a directed verdict and the jury in obedience to the ruling found the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. MartinSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Holton v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Waldron v. WaldronWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Askew v. Joachim Memorial HomeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. The Amphitrite Corp. v. City of Fort LauderdaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Delpa, Inc. v. MartinezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API