Legal Opinion

State v. Langdon

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 6, 1986No. 14277-1-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

—Defendant Gary Gene Langdon appeals his conviction of first degree robbery, arguing that the court violated his Sixth Amendment rights by giving an additional instruction, without contacting defense counsel, after the jury had begun its deliberations. Although such an ex parte instruction was error, we find there was no prejudice to the defendant and therefore affirm.

Langdon was convicted by a King County jury for the first degree robbery of an elderly Seattle man. At trial, a witness testified that he was walking by a parking lot in the Capitol Hill area of Seattle when he saw Langdon and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. DavenportWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. CaliguriWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. State v. SaffordCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  5. State v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. NgWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hue v. Farmboy Spray Co., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. RienksCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. State v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API