Legal Opinion · Dissent
Roginski v. Rose
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 3, 1983Published
1DissentWeinstein, J.
dissents and votes to grant the petition to the extent of annulling the determination and remitting the matter to the board of zoning appeals for further proceedings, with the following memorandum: Petitioner owns a parcel of land approximately 44 feet wide and 91 feet deep which is located within the Town of Hempstead in a strip zoned as a business district. The parcel, which is improved with a one-story cinder block and brick building, abuts a residential “B” district improved with one-family dwellings. On or about November 12,1981, petitioner applied to the Department of Buildings of *418the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- North Shore Steak House, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of the Incorporated Village of ThomastonNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Lemir Realty Corp. v. LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Tandem Holding Corp. v. Board of Zoning Appeals of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- MATTER OF CMTY. SYNAGOGUE v. BatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.