W.W. v. I.M.

SKILLMAN, J.A.D.,

dissenting.

I an/ unable to agree with the part of the majority’s opinion which concludes that “an exception to the hearsay rule is made *517for forensic reports in custody cases” (at 502). Furthermore, I am convinced that psychological reports which the trial court erroneously admitted into evidence played a significant role in its decision awarding custody of Charles to Walter.1 Therefore, I dissent from the majority’s affirmance of the trial court’s custody order insofar as it relates to the 1988-1989 school year.2

Charles was born out of wedlock on August 15, 1980 and remained…