Austin v. Austin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun; North, J. Claim by Alice M. Austin against the estate of Prank Austin, deceased, for moneys expended in maintaining the minor children of decedent. It was allowed by the commissioners on claims. Lola M. Austin, executrix of the estate of decedent appealed to the circuit court where the judgment was affirmed. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
The claim of Alice M. Austin against the estate of Frank Austin, deceased, was presented in the probate court of Calhoun county, where ancillary administration was had in said estate. The claim was for the support, care, and maintenance of the two children of said parties, to wit, Helen and Pearl. The claim was allowed by the commissoners on claims, and an appeal was taken by Lola M. Austin, executrix, to the circuit court, where the decision of the commissioners was affirmed; the circuit judge having filed findings of fact and conclusions of law therein.
The claim grows out of a decree of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maslen v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- In re MorganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Ex parte GordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Zuver v. ZuverSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Pingree v. PingreeMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- West v. WestMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Oakes Farming Ass'n v. Martinson Bros.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Closson v. ClossonWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.