Legal Opinion

Adams Grain & Provision Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 16, 1916PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Eqnity Court of the city of Richmond. Judgment for the defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

The essential facts of this case, from the standpoint of a demurrer to evidence, are these: Plaintiffs in error, who are wholesale dealers in hay, flour, grain, etc., leased from the defendant in error two-thirds of the floor space on the first floor of its two-story brick warehouse, located at the corner of Marshall and Seventeenth streets, in the city of Richmond. The leased space included the southern end of the building, and was partitioned off from the remainder of the floor, which together with all the rest of the building was reserved by the lessor and was wholly in its possession and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kecoughtan Lodge No. 29, Knights of Pythias v. Steiner & KaufmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  2. Dudley v. Lewis Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Charlow v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Business Bank v. F.W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1992
  3. Schurman v. American Stores Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
  4. Jacobs v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API