Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pulliam v. Mississippi State Hudspeth Regional Center

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

Decided May 20, 2014No. 2013-WC-00409-COAPublished

1DissentCarlton, J.

¶34. I respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion in this case. As provided by Mississippi Workers’ Compensation Commission Procedural Rule 9(4), Pulliam possessed fifteen days to object to the affidavit at issue after receiving Hud-speth’s notice of intent to use the affidavit to admit Dr. Collipp’s medical report into evidence at the hearing before the AJ.3 Pulliam failed, however, to timely object to the use of the affidavit to admit the attached medical reports4 into evidence as required by Procedural Rule 9(4), and she thus failed to preserve the issue for appellate review.5…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Georgia Pacific Corp. v. TaplinMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Raytheon Aerospace Support Serv. v. MillerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Delta Drilling Co. v. CannetteMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Sonford Products Corp. v. FreelsMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Walker Mfg. Co. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API