State v. Speed
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
First, we determine whether the trial court committed evident, obvious and clear error affecting the defendant's substantial rights. If the defendant does not get past the first step, our inquiry ends. If we determine that a plain error occurred, however, we then must decide whether the error actually resulted in manifest injustice or a miscarriage of justice.
State v. Smith , 370 S.W.3d 891, 894 (Mo. App. E.D. 2012) (internal citations omitted).
Analysis
In Speed's sole point on appeal, he asserts that the trial court plainly erred by admitting State's exhibits 109 through 111 and 114 through…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RousanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- State v. BurnfinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- State of Missouri v. Christopher L. CollingsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2014
- State v. ManleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State of Missouri v. Ashley ColvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023
- State of Missouri v. Carl Justin TownsendMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- State of Missouri v. Carlton James DickersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- State of Missouri v. Daniel RileyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
- State of Missouri v. Jeffery Lynn NicholsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.