McGray Construction Company Beaver Insurance Company v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs Harry Hurston
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1DissentKleinfeld, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent.
While I agree with the majority that Hurston was not engaged in maritime employment at the time of his injury, I do not agree that Hurston’s past record of maritime employment can transmute his entitlement to state worker’s compensation into a federal entitlement to Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Act benefits.
Suppose two construction workers are hired to do exactly the same non-maritime job together, Hurston’s job, which we are told is “pile driver to repair and replace sheet piling on an oil processing platform.” Assume that, as in the case at bar, a load is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- P. C. Pfeiffer Co. v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Herb's Welding, Inc. v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- John Papai, Joanna Papai v. Harbor Tug and Barge CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Texports Stevedore Co. v. WinchesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.