Legal Opinion

Fenwick v. American States Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 1988No. 87-1057PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the trial court’s holding that the appellant, Robert Fenwick, is not entitled to uninsured motorist benefits under his employer’s policy of insurance with the appellee insurance company. Appellant was injured when an uninsured vehicle struck the phone booth he was occupying. The trial court held that the policy only covered employees of the company while they were occupying a company car and that this coverage scheme did not violate the mandatory uninsured motorist insurance provisions in the Florida statutes. Cf. Pearcy v. Travelers Indemnity Co., 429 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mullis v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. Pearcy v. Travelers Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Babcock v. United Services Auto. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. AUTO-OWNERS INS. v. Above All Roofing, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Lampkin v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of PittsburghDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API