Screeton v. ASCO Vending, Inc.

Screeton’s failure to preserve issues made consideration of this appeal more difficult than it should have been. Her arguments related to consideration and no-vation were meritorious, and a full analysis of these issues may have resulted in reversal. But I must agree with my colleagues that these arguments were not preserved for appellate review due to Screeton’s failure to obtain a ruling from the circuit court. Nonetheless, I cannot agree with the majority’s decision to affirm the circuit court, as the circuit court misapplied the parol evidence rule when it granted the Scotts’ motion for…