Shoemaker v. Lacey
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Warren District Court. This action is brought by plaintiffs in equity for the cancellation of a tax deed, and for general relief. On the trial "the District Court rendered judgment for defendant, dismissing plaintiffs’ petition. Plaintiffs appeal. The further facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Ch. J.
*278i. tax sale: separate sales of same tract, 2_._. redemption. *277— -The lands in controversy were sold on the 13th day of October 1864 by the county treasurer to 'the defendant for the delinquent taxes of 1863, as the S. E. J of N. E. J, and the S. W. ¿ of N. E. ¿ of Section 22, Tp. 77, Eange 24. The sale book of the treasurer also shows a sale of the same land, described as an eighty acre tract, on the same day to the same purchaser, for the taxes of 1863. The amounts of these two sales differ and there is some evidence tending to show that the sale of the land as an eighty, was in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Preston v. Van GorderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1871
- Noble v. BullisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Corning Town Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- McCague Investment Co. v. MallinWyoming Supreme Court · 1918
- Bowman v. EckstienSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
- Bitzer v. BeckeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Mayor of Nashville v. CowanTennessee Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.