Legal Opinion
Haynes v. Williams Fence and Aluminum
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 21, 2003No. 2002-C-0442, 2002-C-0478PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
851 So.2d 917 (2003)
Kenneth HAYNES
v.
WILLIAMS FENCE AND ALUMINUM.
Nos. 2002-C-0442, 2002-C-0478.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
April 21, 2003.
Bradley J. Gabel, Percy, Smith, Foote & Gabel, Alexandria, Counsel for Applicant in No. 2002-C-442 and Respondent in No. 2002-C-478.
George A. Flournoy, Flournoy, Doggett & Losavio, Alexandria, Counsel for Respondent in No. 2002-C-442 and Applicant in No. 2002-C-478.
ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING
2Per curiam
In its rehearing application, Williams Fence for the first time claims attorney's fees for arbitrary and capricious discontinuance of rehabilitation services are not…
Also in this document: Dissent.
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Jones v. Universal FabricatorsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Dubois v. Louisiana Forest IndustriesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Alexander v. Roy O. Martin Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Rollins v. Glitsch Field Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- Mistrot v. York Intern.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
4Cited by20 opinions
- Rivera v. M & R Cable Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
- Lewis v. TEMPLE INLANDLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
- EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINIST. v. WallaceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Johnson v. CONAGRA POULTRY CO.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009
- Canizaro v. Tangipahoa Parish School SystemLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.